"Tomislav" <tstamac@d3let3thisrao.hr> wrote in message
news:47c88338$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> But why in the name of God don't, indyproject web administrator or who
> ever is responsible to do that job, does not remove downloads of old
> versions, buggy or not, and puts version 9.0.50. or the one which is known
> to to be good enough for production.
That'll be me... sorta. I don't have any access to the actual file
downloads, just the basic webpages. I cannot remove old versions of Indy as
I have no access to the downloadable files which are stored on a seperate
server to which I have no access. I thought I had stated on the site that
the dev was the best version - my apologies if this is not the case, I will
update it when I get a moment.
> I mean You said that's pretty old version You have, but when I was (few
> days ago) downloading it I thought that it's the latest stable release for
> version 9, and that is what I need :)
Again, my apologies, I'll re-word it. The thing is, the Indy crew don't want
.50 known as the official stable release because .. well they have their
reasons and I'm not going to label the snapshot as a stable release as
they're not happy that .50 is a stable release... even though it pretty much
is and I use it myself.
