"Jamie Dale" <jamie.dale@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4727a8c5$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Anyway, what happened to the client?
CommandHandlers were added to the client in Indy 10.
> Surely it would of been just as useful to have commandhandlers
> on the client side wouldn't it?
For protocols were the server sends commands to the client instead of the
other way around, yes.
> How come this was never implemented?
It was - in Indy 10. In fact, the CommandHandlers system was separated out
from TIdTCPServer and generalized a bit more. Two new components have thus
been added in Indy 10 - TIdCmdTCPServer and TIdCmdTCPClient. This way,
people who don't want to use CommandHandlers don't have the overhead
anymore.
Gambit
