"Jamie Dale" <j.dale@turboz.net> wrote in message
news:4522bc92@newsgroups.borland.com...
> > Why do you say that?
>
> Because you told me to upgrade. Seriously. <== Ring bells? ;)
That is not what I was asking. Why do you think that Indy 10 is the
downfall of Indy?
> In your opinion which one is really the best to use? - 9 or 10? (win32
VCL)
Indy 9 is in a maintenance mode. It will not be getting any new features,
only occasional bug fixes. It is good enough for most hings, but Indy 10 is
what you will have to use eventually moving into the future.
> >> I don't have ReadTimeOut.
> >
> > Yes, you do.
>
> Sory but no I don't.
Yes, Indy 8 does have a read timeout for ReadLn().
> You have previously stated that you do not have the source for V8
Not locally, no. But that does not mean that it is not available for
download when needed.
> so I'm curious why you think I do have ReadTimeOut.
Because your own code shows it. And because the Indy 8 source code on the
Indy website shows that a read timeout exists. And yes, the ReadLnTimedOut
property exists in Indy 8 as well.
> Would you like a screen capture of the available options Delphi
> provides after the '.' ?
No, because I do not trust Delphi's auto-complete features. They are known
to be buggy at times and not show everything. I only trust the actual
source code.
Gambit
