Hi Remy, thanks for your usual quick and helpful response!
"Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <no.spam@no.spam.com> wrote in message
news:4522ab7a$3@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
> "Jamie Dale" <j.dale@turboz.net> wrote in message
> news:4522a522@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
>> I know you'd like me to upgrade but V10 seems to be the downfall of Indy
>
> Why do you say that?
Because you told me to upgrade. Seriously. <== Ring bells? ;)
>
>> V9 I continue to see bug reports for on the newsgroups.
>
> These are support newsgroups, afterall.
Point taken ;)
> Most postings are problem reports,
> and even then only by a small group of users who know where to send such
> reports. That doesn't mean the version is not usable to the general
> masses.
> A lot of users are using it just fine.
Fair do's - I'll consider upgrading - In your opinion which one is really
the best to use? - 9 or 10? (win32 VCL)
>> V8 despite it's age doesn't seem to be raising many issues here apart
>> from my lack of knowledge.
>
> And its lack of features.
True, I did get V10 working in D2005 for .NET (thought I couldn't get the
.NET ability of Indy to work at all) and there were some things I liked but
for me it didn't justify the agro of getting it all working in the first
place.
>
>> Sorry if I sound arrogant with this attitude but after my experience with
>> Indy 10 for .NET and the compilation errors I decided to wait until the
>> Indy pit crew manage to put together a full proper release which has been
>> zipped. Not a live copy which they work on and may not work.
>
> I wouldn't hold my breathe for a full release anytime soon. That is
> simply
> the nature of open source projects. The code is always "live".
Thats obviously fair enough and I respect that. It would just be nice if
they would at least zip one fairly stable version temporarily instead of
offering live files which get tinkered with all the time.
>
>> I don't have ReadTimeOut.
>
> Yes, you do.
Sory but no I don't. You have previously stated that you do not have the
source for V8 so I'm curious why you think I do have ReadTimeOut. It is not
there. I don't know how else I can say it. Would you like a screen capture
of the available options Delphi provides after the '.' ?
Thanks for you help
Jamie
